Renault’s entry into the Indian automobile market brought initial optimism due to its aggressive pricing, innovative design, and international pedigree. However, despite early successes with models like the Duster and Kwid, Renault’s growth has plateaued and now shows signs of strategic stagnation. This paper explores the multifaceted reasons why Renault may fail in India, including product limitations, service inefficiencies, competitive disadvantages, regulatory gaps, and cultural misalignments that have undermined its relevance in a hyper-competitive and value-conscious market.
As a seasoned digital marketing consultant and strategic analyst with over eight years of experience working across Indian and international automotive campaigns, I bring a practitioner’s perspective to this discussion. Previously, I conducted an in-depth study of Nissan’s market failure in India, examining structural flaws, customer sentiment, and strategic misalignments within the same Renault-Nissan alliance. This background gives me a unique comparative lens to analyze Renault’s trajectory through both operational and consumer-centric frameworks. By combining professional insight, campaign audit data, and on-ground customer feedback, this paper provides a realistic and strategic evaluation of Renault’s missteps and offers actionable pathways to recovery—if it acts in time.
The Indian automobile market—ranked among the top five in the world—is one of the most complex and competitive environments for global car manufacturers. With its unique mix of price-sensitive consumers, infrastructure disparities, regional variations, and a growing appetite for innovation, India demands more than just product excellence. Success here hinges on deep localization, responsive service networks, and consistent customer experience—factors where many global brands have struggled to deliver.
Renault, the French automotive giant, officially entered the Indian market in 2005 through a joint venture with Mahindra & Mahindra and began operating independently in 2010. The brand enjoyed early success with the Renault Duster, which effectively pioneered the compact SUV category in India, and later with the Renault Kwid, which disrupted the entry-level hatchback segment with SUV-inspired styling at an aggressive price point. These launches helped Renault establish a respectable presence and briefly outpace global competitors in India.
However, Renault’s initial momentum has not translated into sustainable growth. Its limited product portfolio, lack of innovation in emerging categories like EVs and hybrids, and increasingly disappointing after-sales service have contributed to a slow but visible decline in brand relevance. In an era when customer expectations are rising and rivals are adapting aggressively, Renault’s operations in India appear disconnected from the evolving market pulse.
My perspective on this issue is not just analytical but deeply personal. As a marketing consultant and strategist with over eight years of experience working on Indian and international automotive campaigns, I have professionally analyzed brand performance, campaign results, and customer behavior across the sector. Notably, I previously conducted a detailed study on why Nissan failed in India, identifying patterns of strategic misalignment, product stagnation, and customer dissatisfaction.
Adding further depth to this paper is my real-world experience as a long-distance Renault customer. I personally drove a Renault Kiger for over 30,000 kilometers in just four months, covering extreme terrains across Indian states—a testament to the vehicle’s baseline reliability. However, this extensive usage also exposed me to the brand’s chronic after-sales issues, as I was forced to visit Renault service centers over 14 times within this short span. I encountered poor service coordination, undertrained staff, billing discrepancies (including instances of payments being accepted in personal accounts), and delays in basic issue resolutions. These repeated lapses have provided me with unique insights into operational failures that go beyond what typical consumer surveys or executive dashboards can reveal.
This paper combines professional market analysis with lived user experience to examine the systemic issues plaguing Renault’s India operations. Through this dual lens, it aims to answer a crucial question: Why is Renault—despite its strong global standing—failing to retain momentum in one of the world’s most dynamic auto markets? And more importantly, what must be done to change course?
Renault’s journey in India has been anything but linear. The French automaker entered the Indian market in 2005 through a joint venture with Mahindra & Mahindra, launching the Renault Logan under the Mahindra-Renault banner. While the Logan offered European styling and build quality, it struggled with poor localization, an awkward design by Indian tastes, and a pricing mismatch. The venture dissolved in 2010, after which Renault established Renault India Pvt. Ltd., marking its independent operations in the country.
The company’s real breakthrough came in 2012 with the Renault Duster, which can be credited for creating the compact SUV segment in India. At a time when most Indian buyers were choosing between sedans and hatchbacks, the Duster offered a fresh proposition—an urban SUV with muscular styling, higher ground clearance, and rugged appeal. It quickly captured market attention and helped Renault build a new identity separate from its failed JV past.
Encouraged by this success, Renault pursued an aggressive product strategy to expand its market share. In 2015, it launched the Renault Kwid, a budget-friendly hatchback that drew immediate consumer attention due to its bold SUV-like styling, digital instrument cluster, touchscreen infotainment system, and strong mileage—all at a sub-₹4 lakh starting price. The Kwid directly challenged the dominance of the Maruti Alto and Hyundai Eon, gaining rapid traction among first-time car buyers and Tier 2/3 city consumers.
During this period, Renault strategically leveraged CMF-A (Common Module Family – Affordable) platforms, a cost-efficient architecture developed in partnership with Nissan, allowing them to achieve economies of scale and price competitiveness in developing markets. By localizing production at its Chennai-based manufacturing plant and expanding its dealership footprint, Renault briefly emerged as India’s third-largest carmaker by volume in 2016–2017.
However, the seeds of future stagnation were already being sown. Despite success with a few models, Renault’s portfolio remained thin and overly reliant on limited platforms. The brand failed to introduce new models or meaningful facelifts at the pace required in a hyper-competitive market. It also missed out on capitalizing on premium segments or launching vehicles in the fast-growing mid-size SUV and crossover categories.
Moreover, while brands like Maruti Suzuki and Hyundai were expanding into hybrid tech, premium variants, and performance upgrades, Renault continued to position itself around affordability without elevating perceived value. Over time, this led to a brand image problem: Renault was no longer viewed as aspirational, nor did it have the loyalty-driven affordability perception of Maruti.
By 2020, Renault attempted a refresh with the Renault Triber (a modular 7-seater MPV) and later the Kiger (a subcompact SUV launched in 2021), both aimed at volume-driven segments. While these products received decent initial reception, they were not able to replicate the impact of the Duster or Kwid due to increased competition, design fatigue, and lack of differentiation.
In essence, Renault’s initial success in India was built on timely product innovation, gap-filling strategy, and cost-effective engineering. However, its failure to evolve in line with market dynamics, invest in deeper localization, and consistently elevate customer experience has since eroded that early advantage.
Renault’s ability to sustain growth in India has been severely hampered by a flawed and increasingly outdated product strategy. While its early offerings like the Duster and Kwid were well-timed and disruptive, the brand failed to build on that momentum. Instead of evolving with the changing preferences of Indian consumers, Renault has continued to rely on a narrow, aging portfolio and an affordability-first positioning that no longer excites the market. This section dissects the key product-related shortcomings that are now threatening Renault’s viability in India.
One of the most significant and enduring weaknesses in Renault’s India strategy is its extremely limited and shallow product portfolio. As of 2025, Renault’s offerings are restricted to three active models: the Kwid (entry-level hatchback), the Triber (modular MPV), and the Kiger (subcompact SUV). This lineup, while strategically placed in high-volume segments, is insufficient to cater to the evolving and increasingly segmented needs of Indian automobile buyers.
The Indian auto market has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past decade. Consumer preferences have shifted from basic utility vehicles to feature-rich, safety-assured, and tech-enhanced cars that offer emotional value as much as functional reliability. Buyers in India today have distinct preferences across body types (SUVs, sedans, hatchbacks, EVs, crossovers), powertrains (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric), and technology stacks (connected features, safety ratings, infotainment systems). Renault’s current portfolio is far too narrow to address these demands.
While other global and domestic manufacturers have expanded aggressively into these emerging categories, Renault has made no meaningful entry into:
Mid-size SUVs (like the Hyundai Creta, Kia Seltos, Maruti Grand Vitara)
Sedans, which still retain a loyal buyer base in both fleet and family segments
Premium hatchbacks with upscale interiors and performance tuning
Electric Vehicles, a growing category heavily backed by government subsidies and consumer interest
Hybrid powertrains, now seen as a bridge between ICE and EVs
As a result, Renault is increasingly perceived as a “budget-only” brand, lacking both aspiration and premium offerings. This perception severely restricts its appeal to middle- and upper-income consumers who are looking to upgrade or switch brands.
Another key weakness lies in Renault’s inability to create product ecosystems or step-up ladders that allow a customer to remain within the brand across different life stages. For instance, a buyer might begin with a hatchback, move to a compact SUV, and later upgrade to a full-sized SUV or premium crossover. Brands like Hyundai, Tata, and Mahindra enable this journey seamlessly. Renault does not.
This lack of upward mobility forces brand churn—as customers outgrow Renault’s offerings, they have no choice but to shift to other manufacturers. The result is not just lost revenue but lost customer lifetime value (CLTV) and weakening of brand equity.
Renault’s over-reliance on the Kwid, Triber, and Kiger has made the brand vulnerable to even minor dips in product performance or customer sentiment. None of these models has received significant upgrades or platform evolutions that would justify their sustained relevance. Instead, minor facelifts and cosmetic changes have become the norm—while competition introduces all-new generations and segment-first innovations.
In fact, the Kwid, once considered a disruptive hatchback, is now often criticized for its aging interiors, limited safety features, and uninspiring performance. Similarly, the Triber, though modular and space-efficient, hasn’t seen meaningful feature additions or engine improvements since its launch. The Kiger, Renault’s most recent launch, shows promise but is already trailing behind competitors in connected car tech, performance options, and brand appeal.
A lack of portfolio depth leads to multiple strategic disadvantages:
Reduced market share potential due to absence in growing or premium segments
Overexposure to entry-level segments, which are price-sensitive and low-margin
Inability to attract repeat customers, leading to low customer retention
Weak resistance to competition, as rivals continue to expand their offerings aggressively
This shallow product lineup also limits Renault’s ability to leverage brand equity across categories, offer bundled ownership experiences, or create aspirational value in the eyes of Indian consumers.
In a market as diverse and fast-evolving as India, a robust and versatile product portfolio is not a luxury—it’s a necessity. Renault’s current lineup is not only inadequate in terms of quantity but also lacking in diversity, innovation, and long-term consumer engagement potential. Unless the brand takes urgent steps to expand its portfolio across segments, price points, and propulsion technologies, its chances of remaining relevant in India will continue to diminish.
Innovation is the lifeblood of success in the Indian automotive market—a domain where product life cycles are shortening, buyer expectations are rising, and competition is relentless. In this context, Renault’s sluggish pace of innovation has emerged as a critical strategic weakness that threatens its future relevance in India.
While the brand made an early mark by disrupting existing categories with the Duster and the Kwid, it has since failed to maintain momentum. In contrast to competitors who regularly launch new products, update their tech stacks, and invest in electrification, Renault has followed a reactive, delayed, and minimalist approach to innovation—often doing too little, too late.
After the success of the Kwid (2015), Renault failed to introduce any product that could redefine or even seriously challenge its segment. The Triber (2019), while modular and affordable, did not innovate in engine performance or interior quality. The Kiger (2021) arrived in the fast-growing compact SUV market but brought nothing revolutionary to the table—featuring a shared CMF-A+ platform and underwhelming turbo petrol engine.
Meanwhile, rival OEMs like Hyundai, Kia, Tata, and Mahindra have not only refreshed their core lineups every 2–3 years but have also introduced segment-first innovations in:
ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems)
Connected Car Platforms with OTA (Over-the-Air) updates
Voice-controlled infotainment and AI integration
Hybrid and EV powertrains
Sunroofs, air purifiers, and other premium segment crossovers—even in budget cars
Renault has not introduced any of these features in India, even as customer expectations have normalized around them.
Innovation in the Indian market must go beyond cosmetic changes. It requires ground-level understanding of consumer usage patterns, road conditions, climate variability, and infrastructure limitations. Unfortunately, Renault has not invested sufficiently in localized R&D or co-developing India-specific innovations.
Examples include:
No significant development in fuel efficiency optimization, despite India’s fuel price sensitivity
No advancement in AMT/CVT tuning for Indian driving conditions
Lack of integration with Indian smart mobility trends, like UPI-based payment for tolls, vehicle tracking, or government-led app integrations like FASTag and Bharat Series compliance
Neglect of India’s EV charging infrastructure context, with no roadmap to offer compact EVs that could lead the urban mobility segment
Such oversights indicate not just underinvestment, but a fundamental disconnect between Renault’s innovation pipeline and India’s dynamic automotive landscape.
Whereas most competitors now follow 12–24 month update cycles, Renault’s product refreshes have been cosmetic, inconsistent, and sparse. Trims and variants are changed, but platforms remain unchanged. Engine performance has barely improved. Feature additions are often too incremental to influence purchase decisions.
For example:
The Kiger, launched in 2021, still lacks mid-cycle facelifts with substantial feature additions
The Kwid, once a leader in digital instrument clusters and infotainment, now looks technologically outdated
BS6.2 (OBD-II) compliance updates came late compared to competitors who aligned faster with emission norms and used the opportunity to reposition their models as “greener and smarter”
Delayed responses to regulatory, environmental, and consumer behavior shifts only reinforce the perception that Renault is struggling to innovate in real time.
Perhaps the most glaring example of Renault’s delayed innovation is its absence from the EV and hybrid vehicle ecosystem. Despite clear policy direction from the Indian government—through FAME II subsidies, state-level EV incentives, and infrastructure push for electrification—Renault has neither announced nor tested any EVs for the Indian market.
Even as companies like Tata Motors, MG Motor, Mahindra, and Hyundai roll out EV variants across price points, Renault continues to project silence on this front. Considering that Renault has global EV assets like the ZOE and Dacia Spring EV, its failure to localize or pilot even one model in India reflects a worrying lack of strategic urgency.
This oversight is particularly damaging because it sidelines Renault from both government EV programs and the rising class of environmentally conscious Indian consumers—especially in metros and Tier 1 cities.
The strategic cost of Renault’s delayed innovation is substantial:
Loss of technological credibility among Indian consumers
Inability to charge premium pricing, due to lack of perceived differentiation
Erosion of first-mover advantage, especially in budget segments it once dominated
Disengagement from future-proof sectors, especially electric mobility and connected ecosystems
Weak appeal to Gen Z and millennial buyers, who now form the core of the new car-buying audience
In an era where Indian consumers are increasingly informed, digitally connected, and quality-conscious, perception often shapes purchasing decisions more than technical specifications. For Renault, one of the most damaging aspects of its current brand trajectory is the growing perception of low product quality—a reputation that has been amplified by actual user experiences, inconsistent service resolution, and lack of transparent quality communication.
While Renault may have succeeded in offering affordable vehicles in the ₹4–10 lakh range, it has failed to convincingly deliver long-term quality and refinement, which consumers increasingly demand—even at entry-level price points. This perception has now taken root across digital platforms, social media, and peer recommendations, significantly impacting Renault’s ability to attract repeat or referral buyers.
Numerous Renault customers—particularly Kwid, Triber, and Kiger owners—have raised consistent complaints related to:
Rattling sounds from dashboards and panels
Door alignment issues and water leakage during rains
Low-grade plastic materials in the interior cabin
Paint peeling and rusting within a short period, especially in humid regions
Unusual engine noise and vibrations above 80–90 km/h
Poor fit and finish, even in top variants
Such problems, when they occur early in the ownership experience, erode customer trust and brand satisfaction. What’s more damaging is that many of these concerns are raised repeatedly by multiple customers on automotive forums, YouTube reviews, and consumer grievance platforms—turning individual issues into collective perception problems.
Having personally driven a Renault Kiger for over 30,000 km in just four months—across highways, rural roads, and hilly terrain—I experienced firsthand how Renault’s initial promise of SUV toughness doesn’t hold under real-world, high-usage conditions.
The cabin insulation was inadequate, especially at highway speeds, leading to engine and tire noise that became fatiguing over long drives.
Multiple panel noises and trim vibrations began appearing as early as the second service.
The plastic door handles, air conditioning vents, and control knobs showed wear and tear within weeks.
Despite being positioned as a modern urban SUV, the Kiger’s driving experience felt closer to an entry-level hatchback, both in refinement and road stability.
These quality issues, when paired with slow and sometimes dismissive responses from service centers (covered in detail in Section 4), validated the perception that Renault products are not built to last, especially under Indian driving conditions.
Renault has adopted a feature-first marketing approach—touchscreens, LED DRLs, and digital clusters dominate its advertising. However, these features often mask core weaknesses in structural quality:
Doors lack the “thud” or solid feel associated with stronger builds
Bonnet and boot panels feel light and hollow
NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) insulation is sub-par
Cabin materials and seats feel ergonomically inferior in long-distance usage
As a result, consumers who are initially impressed during test drives often feel buyer’s remorse within months of ownership—a dangerous dynamic for brand reputation.
The perception of low quality is compounded by mediocre safety ratings:
The Kwid, for instance, scored 1 star in Global NCAP, even after structural modifications
The Triber achieved 3 stars, still lower than competitors like Tata Tiago (4 stars) or Mahindra XUV300 (5 stars)
Renault rarely markets safety features aggressively or transparently, giving the impression that build strength and occupant protection are afterthoughts, not priorities
For a rising class of Indian buyers who now use safety ratings as a core decision-making metric, this further entrenches Renault’s “compromise brand” image.
Perceived low quality has created a self-reinforcing negative loop:
Buyers expect quality compromises when they hear the name “Renault”
Existing owners confirm these perceptions through social media, reviews, and word-of-mouth
Potential buyers hesitate or drop Renault from their consideration list
Renault’s sales decline further, reducing budgets for product improvement or repositioning
This loop, if not disrupted through conscious brand rebuilding and product enhancement, can become terminal in a crowded, brand-sensitive market like India.
In today’s India, perceived quality is not just a product outcome—it’s a brand currency. Renault, by under-delivering on materials, durability, and refinement, has devalued its own brand in the eyes of Indian consumers. The issue is not affordability—Indian buyers can tolerate stripped-down feature sets if the basics are robust—but rather the erosion of trust that comes from quality failures masked by surface-level flash.
If Renault wants to regain relevance, it must prioritize build quality, tactile user experience, and engineering refinement as much as pricing and features. Without this, the brand risks being dismissed not just as outdated—but as unreliable.
In a market like India, where trust and service accessibility play a decisive role in car ownership, after-sales support is not just a functional need—it’s a core component of the brand experience. Many first-time and repeat buyers make purchasing decisions based not just on features or pricing, but on the perceived ease of maintenance, service transparency, and responsiveness of a company’s service network.
Renault’s after-sales performance in India has become one of its biggest liabilities, with rising customer dissatisfaction stemming from undertrained staff, inconsistent service standards, billing irregularities, and poor part availability. Unlike its competitors, who have used service excellence to build long-term loyalty, Renault’s failure in this domain is actively pushing customers—and their networks—away from the brand.
4.1 A Personal Case Study: 30,000 km, 14+ Service Visits
Having personally driven a Renault Kiger for over 30,000 kilometers within just four months, I encountered more than 14 service visits across different cities—a frequency that is unacceptably high for any modern car, let alone a newly purchased SUV. These visits were not for optional upgrades or accident repairs but for recurring issues such as:
Dashboard rattling and cabin noise after just 1,000 km
Fuel system errors and poor mileage, requiring repeated diagnostics
Ineffective air conditioning performance, even in moderate climates
Door panel looseness, fixed temporarily but recurring
During these visits, I faced:
Service staff unable to diagnose issues correctly
Spare parts taking weeks to arrive
Multiple follow-ups with no resolution
Service advisors offering to take payments via personal UPI or cash, bypassing the official billing process
Call center escalation teams who never followed through
This experience is not anecdotal—it reflects a larger systemic breakdown in Renault’s ability to deliver consistent, trustworthy after-sales care.
4.2 Inadequate Service Network Coverage
Renault’s service center footprint in India is sparse, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. For a country where long-distance driving, family-based car ownership, and local maintenance are common expectations, accessibility is non-negotiable.
While brands like Maruti Suzuki and Tata Motors have made rural and semi-urban service expansion a strategic priority, Renault appears to have stagnated in Tier 1 metro markets. The result is:
Longer travel times for basic service
Lack of skilled technicians outside major cities
Heavy dependency on a handful of dealerships in each state
This severely limits Renault’s growth in a country where the next wave of auto expansion is expected to come from non-metro areas.
4.3 Undertrained and High-Churn Staff
Multiple dealership audits and customer reviews reveal that service advisors and technicians at Renault service centers often lack adequate training, both in technical diagnostics and customer handling. Some common issues include:
Misdiagnosing vehicle faults, leading to repeat visits
Inability to explain technical issues or quote estimated costs transparently
Poor documentation and follow-up procedures
High turnover among technicians and front-office staff, resulting in inconsistent service quality
This leads to a situation where the customer feels confused, neglected, and distrustful—often shifting their servicing needs to third-party garages, or avoiding the brand in future purchases.
4.4 Spare Part Delays and Pricing Ambiguity
Another major pain point in Renault’s after-sales ecosystem is the non-availability of critical spare parts and the ambiguous pricing structure. Customers often report waiting:
2–4 weeks for basic components like brake pads, clutch cables, or AC vents
More than a month for exterior parts, such as bumpers, fenders, and mirrors
Moreover, there’s no centralized or transparent spare parts pricing system accessible to customers—making them dependent on what the service advisor quotes, which varies across locations. In contrast, companies like Hyundai and Tata have invested in digital service cost calculators, parts price transparency, and mobile servicing units, giving them a clear competitive edge.
4.5 Weak Complaint Resolution and Escalation Handling
When customers escalate their concerns to Renault India via email, social media, or helpline channels, they are often met with generic responses, ticket closures without resolution, or no follow-up at all. The lack of:
Dedicated customer care ownership
Timely callbacks
Compensation or courtesy offerings
Creates a brand image of arrogant apathy—particularly harmful in a country where emotional brand relationships and word-of-mouth are vital.
4.6 Lack of Digitization and User-Friendly Interfaces
In 2025, customer experience is as much about digital enablement as it is about physical infrastructure. Unfortunately, Renault India lags behind in:
Offering real-time service tracking apps
Enabling digital appointment booking across all centers
Providing vehicle history logs and smart diagnostics
Facilitating app-based loyalty rewards or extended warranty tracking
While competitors are integrating AI chatbots, service estimators, and service-on-wheels apps, Renault’s digital after-sales tools remain underdeveloped and unreliable—leading to customer disengagement post-sale.
Renault’s poor after-sales experience is more than just a service flaw—it is a strategic brand failure. In India, where trust-building and maintenance reliability are central to auto ownership, weak service can erase even the strongest product advantages. The gap between customer expectations and Renault’s ground-level execution is wide—and widening.
Unless Renault urgently revamps its service operations, trains its workforce, increases service touchpoints, and rebuilds post-sale trust, it risks alienating its existing customer base and becoming a cautionary tale in automotive customer experience failure.
In the automobile industry, especially in highly competitive and emotionally driven markets like India, brand perception is as important as product performance. It shapes consumer expectations, justifies pricing, and builds long-term equity. While Renault entered India with the potential to position itself as a smart, value-driven European alternative to Japanese and Indian incumbents, the brand has struggled to hold a consistent or compelling image over time.
From being seen as an innovator in its early days to now being perceived as a “budget compromise brand,” Renault’s brand positioning has eroded, lacking clarity, aspiration, and consumer resonance. This section explores the missteps, missed opportunities, and market responses that have pushed Renault to the margins of consumer consideration.
While brands like Hyundai are seen as feature-rich and reliable, and Maruti as economical and service-friendly, Renault lacks a distinct, positive identity among Indian buyers. Renault’s initial entry was defined by the Duster’s rugged appeal and the Kwid’s stylish affordability—two products that set the tone for a brand that promised global engineering at Indian prices. However, over time, Renault failed to define what it stands for:
It is not considered a premium brand like Hyundai or Volkswagen.
It lacks the “value-for-money + trust” equation that brands like Maruti Suzuki enjoy.
It is not perceived as safety- or performance-focused like Tata or Mahindra.
Nor is it leading in technology or EV innovation like MG or BYD.
This lack of a core identity leaves Renault adrift in consumer consciousness, often seen as a brand that offers neither strong emotional value nor exceptional functional advantage.
Renault once had the advantage of being perceived as a European brand, which carries aspirational value in India. However, its obsession with pricing aggressively to compete with domestic brands has led to perceived brand dilution.
Low-cost materials and basic interiors betray the “European quality” promise.
Rebadged Dacia models and outdated global designs reinforce the idea that India gets Renault’s leftovers.
Minimal advertising around heritage, innovation, or brand legacy has allowed consumer sentiment to shift from “global” to “cut-price foreign.”
As a result, Renault today sits uncomfortably between aspiration and affordability, satisfying neither.
Successful automotive brands in India have invested in lifestyle positioning—selling dreams and identities, not just features. Maruti sells trust and family. Hyundai sells innovation and status. Tata sells safety and national pride. Jeep sells rugged adventure.
Renault, however, has not developed any emotional branding anchor. Its advertising remains tactical—focused on EMI offers, price discounts, and feature checklists—rarely creating a narrative of ownership pride or aspirational identity. This is particularly damaging in a market where car purchases are deeply tied to status and personal success.
Even the Kiger, with its SUV styling and sporty cues, has not been positioned with a strong urban or youth-centric identity. This leaves Renault vulnerable to more culturally connected brands that speak the language of Indian aspirations.
Unlike Mahindra’s “Thar culture” or Tata’s growing safety evangelist community, Renault has not cultivated a brand tribe or loyal user base. There are no strong owner communities, clubs, adventure networks, or brand-led events that turn users into advocates.
My own experience, having driven the Kiger across 30,000 km in 4 months, could have been a compelling brand story. But there were no touchpoints from the brand—no digital engagement, no post-sale relationship building, no recognition of high-mileage usage or product endurance.
In an era of social media-driven influence, not activating real users as brand champions is a lost opportunity for organic perception building.
Renault has also failed to respond proactively to negative online sentiment, especially related to service issues, safety concerns, and ownership grievances:
YouTube reviews and Twitter threads critical of service and build quality are often unacknowledged.
Consumer forums list unresolved complaints without escalation pathways.
No visible reputation management strategy is in place to counter misinformation, offer resolutions, or highlight brand wins.
This digital silence is read by consumers as indifference, further damaging trust in the brand. In contrast, competitors have begun deploying active social CRM (customer relationship management) and real-time resolution strategies that convert complaints into credibility moments.
Renault’s weak brand position is made worse by how effectively its competitors have defined their own identities:
This gap in narrative clarity weakens Renault’s marketing impact and makes it easy to ignore in crowded showroom or online comparisons.
Renault’s brand in India suffers not from a single image flaw, but from an identity vacuum. It is not disliked—it is forgotten. Without a clear, bold, and emotionally resonant positioning, even the best-priced cars cannot cut through the noise. In a market where perception shapes reality, Renault’s unwillingness—or inability—to define what it stands for may ultimately decide its fate more than any single product ever will.
To recover, Renault must undertake a brand repositioning exercise that reconnects it to evolving Indian aspirations, builds post-sale communities, and delivers consistency between brand promise and on-ground experience.
One of the key pillars of automotive success in India is value perception—not simply how affordable a vehicle is, but how much substance, trust, and satisfaction it delivers at a given price point. Renault’s early rise in India was largely driven by its ability to position products like the Kwid and Duster as high-value disruptors. However, that perception has eroded, and today Renault faces a serious credibility gap between its pricing strategy and the value customers expect in return.
This mismatch—between what Renault offers, how much it charges, and how consumers interpret that offering—is contributing to declining purchase interest, poor word-of-mouth, and high customer churn.
Renault’s early pricing success was built on a very specific formula: provide SUV styling, premium-like features, and basic utility at a highly competitive price. The Kwid was sold as a small car with big car vibes. The Duster introduced SUV aesthetics in the ₹8–12 lakh bracket. Both succeeded because they over-delivered for their segment.
But over time, as prices increased due to regulation (BS6, safety compliance) and input costs, Renault failed to match price hikes with meaningful feature upgrades or platform improvements. Today:
The Kwid’s top variants cost ₹6.5+ lakhs on-road, a space now filled with better-built, safer alternatives like the Tata Tiago.
The Kiger’s mid and top variants go upwards of ₹11–12 lakhs, putting them dangerously close to the base variants of the Hyundai Venue, Maruti Brezza, and Tata Nexon—which offer superior engines, safety, and brand equity.
Instead of increasing perceived value with better interiors, tech, performance, or warranty support, Renault continued incremental facelifts—leading customers to ask, “What exactly am I paying for?”
Consumers are often willing to pay more for a product that stands out—be it through styling, warranty programs, after-sales convenience, digital ownership experiences, or resale value. Renault, however, has fallen behind on nearly all value levers:
No standout fuel efficiency advantage (unlike Maruti)
No long-term warranty or buyback promise (unlike Hyundai’s Shield of Trust or Tata’s Gold AMC plans)
No connected car ecosystem (which buyers now expect even in sub-₹10 lakh cars)
Low resale value, especially for the Kwid and Triber, making cost of ownership higher in the long term
As a result, Renault’s cars feel underwhelming compared to price-equivalent competitors, pushing cost-conscious buyers toward other brands offering more bang for their buck.
Another pricing error Renault has made is overpricing top variants without justifying them. Customers expect the top trims of any vehicle to offer:
Enhanced safety features (6 airbags, ESC, hill-hold)
Larger infotainment systems with connected features
Alloy wheels, leather seats, sunroof, or premium touches
Renault’s top variants of the Kiger and Triber offer minimal additions, often limited to superficial upgrades like colored accents or alloy wheels, while still demanding a ₹1–1.5 lakh premium over lower variants. This not only fails to justify the cost but also sends a message that Renault doesn’t understand premium user expectations.
Renault often launches new models with introductory pricing that seems attractive—but rapidly increases prices within months, sometimes without adequate feature enhancements. This has two negative effects:
Early adopters feel penalized, especially when resale values fall faster than expected.
Potential buyers lose trust, anticipating that Renault will bait with price and switch with upgrades.
This short-term pricing approach also creates instability in Renault’s brand appeal, as customers don’t see consistency in pricing versus long-term ownership value.
In an increasingly price-sensitive and EMI-driven market, brands like Maruti, Tata, and Hyundai have partnered with fintech players and banks to offer:
Low down payment schemes
7–8-year tenure EMIs
Comprehensive insurance with zero dep
Easy exchange bonuses and loyalty benefits
Renault’s financial offerings, by contrast, are generic and dealership-driven, often varying in quality and terms. This leads to inconsistent buyer experiences and makes the Renault showroom proposition less attractive during purchase comparison.
Given its global access to affordable EV platforms (Dacia Spring, Renault Zoe), Renault could have used its price-focused brand position to dominate the under ₹10 lakh EV space—where Tata Motors currently enjoys a near monopoly with the Tiago EV. By not entering this space aggressively or early, Renault missed a critical chance to reset its value proposition narrative as an affordable, electric-first disruptor.
Pricing is not about being cheapest—it’s about delivering justifiable, trust-backed value at every price point. Renault has lost this balance. Today, it sits in a dangerous zone: too expensive to be considered a budget brand, too underwhelming to be considered premium, and too inconsistent to command loyalty.
Unless Renault aligns its price, product, and perception, and begins to offer concrete ownership value—through warranties, tech upgrades, fuel efficiency, or resale programs—it will continue to lose ground in a market that rewards both emotional and financial logic.
In a market as diverse, fast-moving, and emotionally driven as India, success in the automotive sector depends not only on engineering strength or price competitiveness—but on a brand’s ability to understand, anticipate, and adapt to changing consumer preferences. This is an area where Renault has consistently underperformed.
Indian car buyers today are no longer driven by basic transportation needs alone. The modern buyer is tech-savvy, safety-conscious, design-aware, digitally connected, and aspirational—and expects manufacturers to keep pace. While rivals like Tata, Hyundai, Mahindra, and Kia have pivoted sharply to align with these evolving tastes, Renault has remained largely static—relying on legacy strategies in a transformed market.
The profile of the Indian car buyer has undergone a seismic shift in the past decade:
Millennials and Gen Z buyers now account for a majority of new car purchases
Consumers increasingly research online and make decisions based on reviews, influencers, safety ratings, and tech features
SUVs and crossovers are replacing hatchbacks and sedans, even in lower segments
Demand for connected features, sunroofs, premium interiors, and hybrid/EV options is rising even below ₹10 lakh
Brand image, resale value, and safety are considered more seriously than ever before
Renault’s response to these trends has been delayed, insufficient, and disconnected—resulting in a widening relevance gap.
Today’s Indian car buyer seeks more than function—they demand form and emotional appeal. Renault’s product designs, while passable at launch, have aged rapidly without significant facelifts or interior overhauls.
The Kwid, once praised for its SUV-like stance in a hatchback body, now feels plasticky and outdated compared to refreshed rivals like the Tata Punch or Maruti Fronx.
The Kiger’s cabin materials, seat comfort, and layout feel a generation behind in terms of tactile feel and modernity.
Interior design lacks ambient lighting, digital cluster innovation, and ergonomic convenience that even budget buyers now prioritize.
In contrast, competitors are offering dual-tone interiors, large infotainment systems, soft-touch surfaces, and feature-rich dashboards—even in sub-₹10 lakh cars. Renault’s failure to upgrade its interior design language reflects its inability to grasp aesthetic trends.
Renault’s offerings remain alarmingly under-equipped in digital and connected features, which are now baseline expectations among Indian buyers:
No built-in connected car platform like Hyundai’s Bluelink or Tata’s iRA
No remote engine start/stop, geofencing, live diagnostics, or OTA updates
Basic infotainment systems without fluid UI/UX or smart voice assistants
Inconsistent availability of Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, especially in lower variants
For a generation that expects their car to feel like an extension of their smartphone, Renault’s tech offerings feel like relics.
As crash test results become viral and GNCAP scores start influencing purchase behavior, brands like Tata and Mahindra have gained significant traction by publicizing their 4- and 5-star rated vehicles. Renault, however:
Has not consistently updated platforms to meet high safety standards
Offers dual airbags and ABS as bare minimums, while competitors move toward 6 airbags, ESC, and TPMS even in mid variants
Does not lead with safety messaging in its marketing or consumer engagement
In doing so, Renault fails to connect with the rising segment of safety-conscious urban families, women buyers, and young professionals—many of whom are now defaulting to Tata and Hyundai.
Another growing preference in India is for multi-utility vehicles that support active, adventurous lifestyles—weekend drives, long-distance touring, off-roading, and city-suburb transitions.
Renault cars, especially the Kiger and Triber, are marketed with SUV-like images but lack performance, road handling, and ground clearance refinement needed for confident long-distance or hilly terrain driving. This creates a mismatch between promised lifestyle and real utility, leading to buyer disappointment and reputational damage.
For example, in my personal 30,000 km journey across states, the Kiger consistently underperformed in hill climbs, lacked highway stability at high speeds, and produced excessive cabin noise. This contrasts sharply with the aspirational image it tries to project in its advertisements.
Indian consumers—especially in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities—are beginning to embrace electric vehicles as a future-forward, cost-saving, and eco-conscious choice. Renault, despite global expertise in EVs (ZOE, Dacia Spring), has made no significant moves to localize, introduce, or even pilot an electric offering in India.
This hesitation means:
Loss of early mover advantage in the ₹7–15 lakh EV segment, where Tata now dominates
Missed opportunity to build a fresh, tech-savvy brand image around sustainability
Zero relevance among young, urban, first-time buyers who are actively considering EVs for daily commutes
Indian consumers are increasingly interested in customization, personal choice, and modular upgrades. Yet Renault’s variant strategy is rigid, with:
Important features like rear wipers, camera, and alloy wheels reserved only for top-end variants
No accessory packs or online configurators to personalize cars
Minimal limited-edition variants, regional editions, or festival-focused offerings
This lack of flexibility fails to meet modern expectations of ownership personalization, reducing showroom engagement and upsell opportunities.
Renault’s India strategy has been deeply compromised by its inability to listen, learn, and respond to evolving consumer behavior. From aesthetics and safety to digital integration and lifestyle aspirations, Renault appears out of sync with the Indian buyer of 2025.
In a market where consumer expectations shift fast and loyalty is earned through relevance, Renault’s slow, rigid approach makes it increasingly obsolete. Without a clear understanding of where Indian consumers are heading—and a product roadmap to match—Renault may find itself marketing to a generation that no longer sees it.
Even when a company has competitive products and pricing, organizational structure and strategic alignment play a decisive role in long-term sustainability—especially in a diverse and complex market like India. Renault’s lackluster performance cannot be attributed to external market conditions alone. A deeper examination reveals internal dysfunctions and strategic oversights that have hampered the company’s ability to adapt, innovate, and lead.
India is not merely a low-cost, high-volume market—it is a market that demands agile decision-making, localized execution, inter-departmental alignment, and clear strategic vision. Renault, unfortunately, suffers from the very structural and leadership shortcomings that prevent long-term competitiveness.
8.1 Fragmented Decision-Making and Global Detachment
Renault’s India operations are often viewed as a satellite function of its European headquarters. This model creates two persistent issues:
Delayed decision-making: Local teams often wait for Paris to approve strategy, pricing, product updates, or investments—by which time competitors have already moved.
Misalignment with market realities: European product strategies are not always suited to Indian road conditions, consumer behavior, or regulatory timelines.
The result is an organization that is slow to respond and risk-averse, even in a market where speed, boldness, and autonomy are rewarded.
8.2 Underutilization of the Renault-Nissan Alliance
Despite being part of the globally recognized Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, Renault has failed to leverage this partnership strategically in India. The alliance was intended to offer:
Shared platforms and powertrains (to reduce cost)
Combined dealer/service networks (to expand reach)
Shared EV tech, safety architecture, and innovation labs
In reality, what has emerged is parallel operations with little synergy:
Product overlaps: Nissan Magnite and Renault Kiger compete instead of complementing
Duplicated networks: Separate service and sales infrastructure instead of unified footprints
No co-branded innovation in India: EV pilots and advanced powertrains developed globally have yet to be implemented or localized jointly in India
This failure to function as a cohesive force has prevented both brands from gaining scale benefits in a market where economies of scale determine price competitiveness and survival.
The once-strong Renault-Nissan Alliance, globally touted as a revolutionary model of resource sharing and cost optimization, has effectively dissolved its joint strategy in India. What was earlier seen as a collaborative force for innovation, platform sharing, and scale has now fragmented into individual corporate agendas, leaving behind a weakened support structure and lost synergy potential in a hypercompetitive market.
As of 2024, Renault has taken full control of the Chennai-based Oragadam plant, which was previously a joint manufacturing facility with Nissan. This transfer was part of the broader alliance restructuring under which:
Nissan and Renault reduced cross-shareholdings globally
Each brand was given more autonomy in key markets
Collaborative development was narrowed to a few global platforms, with India being deprioritized in the alliance roadmap
This shift has had serious consequences in India:
Renault now bears the full cost of manufacturing operations, reducing its ability to price aggressively without impacting margins.
The original benefits of shared vendor ecosystems, joint R&D, and coordinated logistics have significantly reduced.
Nissan, on the other hand, has retreated from product launches and dealer expansion, reducing the alliance’s overall brand visibility and bargaining power in India.
What could have been a combined fight against stronger players (Hyundai-Kia, Tata-JLR, and Maruti-Toyota) has turned into two disconnected brands, each lacking scale, innovation velocity, and consumer loyalty.
This breakdown has eroded several key competitive advantages:
Implications for Renault’s Future in India
This breakdown leaves Renault in a strategic vacuum:
It no longer benefits from the scale and R&D collaboration that helped reduce its cost of innovation.
It has not yet announced any significant reinvestment or India-specific platform plans to replace what was lost.
It now owns the factory, but without volume assurance from both brands, the cost-efficiency of that plant is compromised.
Most critically, Renault is now left to navigate India without a domestic innovation pipeline, while competitors have strong India-first R&D setups (Tata, Hyundai, Mahindra).
In effect, Renault’s shift from shared risk to solo responsibility may give it operational control, but at the cost of flexibility, innovation support, and strategic clarity.
8.3 Leadership Turnover and Directional Instability
Over the past few years, Renault India has seen frequent leadership changes at the top management level. This has led to:
Shifting priorities and inconsistent execution
Lack of long-term commitment to any single product roadmap
A “survival mode” mindset, focused more on short-term sales than brand building
Such instability trickles down to dealer relationships, employee morale, and market confidence. Dealers are less likely to invest in marketing and infrastructure if they feel the company itself lacks strategic continuity.
8.4 Weak Localization and R&D Commitment
Despite operating in India for over a decade, Renault has not made significant investments in local R&D or manufacturing innovation. Most of its vehicles are based on global or Dacia platforms, retrofitted for Indian conditions rather than designed ground-up for Indian needs.
Competitors like Tata, Mahindra, and Hyundai have R&D centers that contribute to global innovation. Renault, in contrast:
Relies heavily on external vendors for parts and assembly
Outsources most of its innovation to global teams, leading to time delays and poor market fit
Lacks deep capability in safety testing, emissions optimization, and EV adaptation for India
This lack of localized R&D also explains the sluggish response to regulatory changes like BS6, GNCAP ratings, and EV incentives.
8.5 Insufficient Dealer Empowerment and Channel Strategy
Renault’s retail network in India is constrained not just by footprint, but by low dealer morale, inadequate margins, and poor support systems. Dealers often report:
Low profitability per vehicle sold
Poor inventory management and delivery timelines
Lack of training or digital tools for customer engagement
Limited co-op marketing budgets or regional campaign planning
As a result, many dealers are hesitant to push Renault products aggressively, especially when rival OEMs offer stronger incentive structures and co-branded promotional support.
8.6 Strategic Myopia: Absence of Long-Term Vision
Perhaps most concerning is the absence of a bold, long-term vision for Renault India. In contrast, other OEMs have clearly defined strategic themes:
Tata: Safety and electrification leadership
Hyundai: Premium experience and connected tech
Mahindra: Adventure SUV dominance and global expansion
Renault’s strategy seems reactive—responding to competition instead of leading—and lacks any clear ambition around:
EV leadership
Digital car ownership
Rural mobility
Subscription or leasing models
Export hub development
This strategic void makes Renault’s India operations feel more like a transactional presence than a growth engine—something that can prove fatal in a market that rewards long-term consistency and narrative clarity.
Organizational fragility and strategic ambiguity are perhaps the most damaging, yet least visible, reasons why Renault is losing relevance in India. Without structural reform, local empowerment, and a reimagined alliance strategy, no amount of product tweaking or discounting will save the brand from gradual obsolescence.
India requires a committed, decentralized, and visionary approach. Unless Renault fixes its house from the inside out, its operational inefficiencies will continue to show up in sales charts, customer feedback, and brand erosion.
9. Competitive Landscape
Renault is no longer just failing in isolation—it is being outclassed at every level by competitors who are:
More ambitious
More attuned to consumer behavior
More aggressive in tech and EV innovation
Better organized in after-sales and branding
In this crowded and brutal battlefield, Renault’s offering appears obsolete, underpowered, and underfunded. With even newer entrants offering more compelling products and narratives, Renault’s competitive window is rapidly closing—unless it reinvents, invests, and repositions with urgency.
India’s automotive sector has undergone rapid transformation over the past decade—not just because of evolving consumer preferences, but also due to a wave of regulatory and policy shifts. Emission norms, safety mandates, electric vehicle incentives, and localization policies have collectively raised the entry barriers for all automakers. In this environment, companies that adapt quickly and proactively align with the government’s agenda tend to gain market and reputational advantage.
Renault, in contrast, has often been reactive, delayed, and underprepared when responding to India’s regulatory landscape. This has further widened its strategic gap compared to rivals who’ve capitalized on policy shifts as growth opportunities.
India’s emphasis on passenger safety has intensified in recent years, with government mandates for:
Dual front airbags (now standard)
ABS with EBD
Reverse parking sensors
Increased focus on Global NCAP crash test ratings
Renault’s compliance history has been patchy and slow:
Some models like the Kwid and Triber initially lacked structural integrity, receiving low safety ratings in crash tests.
Unlike Tata and Mahindra, which invested in high-strength chassis platforms, Renault continued using older cost-optimized global platforms, which underperformed in Indian safety tests.
Renault has made limited investment in elevating its cars to meet 6-airbag or ESC standards across variants, even though these are becoming mandatory.
This reactive approach projects a lack of commitment to Indian lives and safety standards, especially when consumers are now highly conscious of safety ratings in their purchase decisions.
The Indian government has launched aggressive initiatives like:
FAME I & II (Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles)
PLI Scheme (Production-Linked Incentive) for EVs
State-level subsidies and tax exemptions for electric vehicles
While brands like Tata, Mahindra, MG, Hyundai, and BYD have either launched or announced full-fledged EV portfolios to tap into these incentives, Renault has done little to nothing:
No electric variant of Kwid or Kiger announced for India, despite EV-ready global models like Dacia Spring (Kwid EV equivalent) available
No participation in local battery sourcing, EV infrastructure partnerships, or state policy discussions
No visibility in EV roadmaps, pilot programs, or consumer EV awareness campaigns
This lack of action reflects strategic detachment from India’s green mobility push, leaving Renault out of future-ready segments that are being actively shaped by government incentives.
India’s auto policy favors manufacturers who achieve high levels of localization, offering reduced import duties and lower GST slabs. Tata, Mahindra, and Maruti Suzuki benefit from extensive domestic sourcing, helping them:
Keep prices competitive
Avoid vulnerability to global supply chain shocks
Qualify for policy incentives and state procurement schemes
Renault’s Indian cars, particularly the Kiger and Triber, still depend heavily on imported components, which:
Increases cost sensitivity to forex fluctuations
Delays production during global crises (e.g., chip shortages)
Prevents Renault from qualifying for Make in India–linked subsidies
This also leads to limited control over quality and delivery, reducing Renault’s agility in a demand-driven market.
Renault’s portfolio mostly includes budget and subcompact cars, which are extremely price-sensitive. However, regulatory changes such as:
BS6 Phase 1 and 2 emission norms
Increased road tax for compact SUVs
Mandated use of OBD-II and RDE-compliant engines
have increased the cost of production across the board.
While established players like Maruti and Hyundai absorbed these costs more effectively through high volumes and cross-subsidization, Renault’s thin margins and narrow portfolio made compliance more expensive—without the benefit of charging a premium or passing the cost to consumers.
The result? Either price increases that killed competitiveness or cost-cutting that further degraded build quality.
Brands like Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Tata, and Mahindra maintain strong relationships with:
SIAM (Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers)
NITI Aayog (for EV roadmaps)
State-level transport ministries and EV cells
Skill councils and auto testing labs (e.g., ARAI)
These relationships allow them to:
Influence policy direction
Gain early insights into regulatory timelines
Contribute to pilot programs and local planning
Renault, by contrast, has a muted institutional presence. It does not lead or significantly participate in policy conversations, giving it little influence over timelines, subsidies, or regulatory framing.
As a multinational headquartered in France, Renault’s India arm often waits for global green light on localized product development, compliance investments, or emission standard upgrades. This:
Slows down Renault’s response to local mandates
Creates misalignment between India’s urgent needs and global budget cycles
Leads to delayed product approvals and powertrain modifications, as seen during BS6 transitions
This structural inertia means that even when Renault wants to comply, it often responds too late to gain a competitive edge.
Regulatory compliance in India is no longer optional—it is a strategic differentiator. In an era where policy aligns closely with innovation and market potential (especially in EVs, safety, and localization), Renault’s slow, disconnected, and minimalistic response to government expectations has placed it at a significant disadvantage.
Without proactive policy engagement, timely compliance, and structural localization, Renault risks becoming non-compliant, non-eligible for incentives, and non-competitive in the very areas where India’s auto growth is now concentrated.
Renault, despite over a decade in the country, continues to function as an outsider brand—its cars, communications, and customer practices fail to resonate with India’s emotional, behavioral, and aspirational nuances. This cultural disconnect is a silent but potent force contributing to its decline.
Renault’s design language, advertising tone, and customer engagement strategies often miss the emotional and aspirational cues Indian consumers respond to. In contrast, successful players have effectively blended global appeal with local sensitivity.
Beyond engineering and economics, automotive success in India hinges on understanding deep-rooted cultural expectations—a complex interplay of trust, symbolism, community orientation, emotional ownership, and after-sales reassurance. Many foreign automotive brands have struggled not because of product failures but because they misread India’s cultural code.
11.1 Misaligned Brand Storytelling
Indian buyers don’t just buy cars—they buy stories, identities, and emotional experiences. Brands like Tata invoke national pride and safety. Hyundai and Kia position themselves as modern, connected, and aspirational. Maruti communicates trust and family legacy.
Renault’s storytelling, however, has been superficial, overly European in tone, and emotionally sterile. Its ads and campaigns often rely on:
Globalized, tech-heavy messaging with little Indian relevance
Generic SUV imagery without real family, utility, or value connection
Limited localization of humor, festivals, languages, or regional symbolism
As a result, Renault has never established a strong emotional bond with Indian audiences—neither as a status symbol, nor as a reliable companion, nor as a patriotic choice. It lacks a narrative anchor.
11.2 Ownership Experience Not Designed for Indian Context
Indian car owners typically seek long-term reassurance, not just at the point of sale but across years of usage. This includes:
Transparent billing and servicing
Honor-based warranties and flexible goodwill repairs
High involvement of dealership staff in small requests
Deep trust in post-sale brand behavior
Renault’s ownership experience—particularly with the Kiger and Triber—has been marred by:
Inconsistent service quality across dealerships
Lack of human touch and empathy in after-sales processes
Rigid policies and poor escalation resolution
Limited proactive communication or festival-time loyalty offers
Having personally visited the Renault service center 14+ times in just four months, I experienced firsthand how Renault’s systems treat customers transactionally, not relationally. Such disconnects violate the Indian service ethos, where relational trust matters more than process.
11.3 Lack of Community Building and Brand Rituals
Successful automotive brands in India often create communities, events, rituals, and ownership pride moments. For example:
Mahindra organizes Thar drives and adventure rallies
Royal Enfield has ride clubs and national tours
Tata heavily promotes customer safety stories
Hyundai involves customers in service camps, family events, and digital reviews
Renault, on the other hand, has failed to foster any real customer engagement ecosystem. There are no:
User clubs or regional events
Community drives or customer spotlight campaigns
Loyalty-building narratives shared on digital platforms
This makes the brand forgettable post-purchase, offering no shared identity or emotional reinforcement after ownership begins.
11.4 Inflexibility Toward Negotiation and Personalization
The Indian car buyer often expects:
Personalized buying experiences
Minor customization options or freebies at the time of purchase
Negotiation flexibility, especially in Tier 2/3 cities
Salespersons who build relationships, not just close deals
Renault’s dealerships and corporate approach often mimic a Westernized transactional model—fixed pricing, rigid variant structures, limited accessories, and highly centralized approvals. This creates friction in markets where negotiation is seen as a cultural right, not an exception.
11.5 Language, Advertising, and Regional Disconnect
India is not a monolithic market. Its diversity demands hyper-local marketing—with linguistic flexibility, regional symbolism, and culturally nuanced messaging.
Renault’s campaigns often default to:
Standard Hindi or English communication
Urban-centric visuals that alienate rural or Tier 2 buyers
No major endorsements from local celebrities or influencers
Low visibility in vernacular media channels
Competitors like Maruti, Hyundai, and Tata thrive because they advertise differently in Bengal vs. Gujarat vs. Kerala—and participate in local events like Onam, Navratri, or Pongal. Renault’s “one-size-fits-all” strategy makes it appear tone-deaf and foreign, especially outside metros.
11.6 Misreading the Role of a Car in Indian Society
To many Indian families, a car is:
A status symbol and sign of upward mobility
A social enabler (weddings, hospital trips, road trips)
A source of family pride
A heirloom or generational milestone
Renault markets its cars as appliances—value-packed, convenient, compact. But this misses the cultural truth that emotion often overrides logic in Indian automotive buying. Without understanding this, Renault can’t design cars that create memories, not just mobility.
Cultural misalignment is Renault’s most invisible weakness—but possibly its most fatal. It doesn’t show up on balance sheets, but it quietly erodes:
Brand affinity
Word-of-mouth momentum
Dealer enthusiasm
Long-term ownership satisfaction
In India, cars are bought with the head, heart, and heritage. Renault seems to have built a strategy for the head, ignored the heart, and missed the heritage.
Unless it overhauls its cultural approach—infusing regional identity, emotional storytelling, and relational ownership—it will remain a foreign brand in an India that rewards familiarity.
A brand’s credibility is not defined solely by its advertising budget or launch-day impressions. It is built—and eroded—through the consistency between promise and delivery. Renault’s Kiger offers a textbook case study of brand overstatement and operational underperformance, revealing a growing disconnect between marketing narratives and real-world customer experience.
As someone who personally drove a Renault Kiger for over 30,000 km across India in just four months, including 14+ visits to service centers, I experienced the chasm between what Renault claims and what it delivers. This case not only reflects the broader cultural, product, and service issues discussed earlier—it also crystallizes why customer trust is fading and word-of-mouth is weakening.
At launch, Renault positioned the Kiger as:
A “bold and sporty compact SUV”
Engineered for urban adventurers and highway explorers
Packed with segment-first features and premium design
Equipped with advanced tech and comfort for “next-gen” buyers
The advertising visuals included urban skylines, long road trips, off-road detours, and youth-forward aesthetics. Taglines promised “SUV-like performance at hatchback prices”—a clever pitch to India’s upwardly mobile middle class.
On paper, this marketing seemed tight: modern, aspirational, feature-rich, and aligned with rising expectations in the ₹6–10 lakh bracket.
However, the ownership journey with the Kiger rapidly revealed structural weaknesses, quality flaws, and service system breakdowns that betrayed the brand’s promise.
Suspension instability on long drives; poor handling on rough roads
Cabin noise and vibrations at high speeds, despite SUV branding
Plastic cladding and trims prone to early wear and looseness
Unreliable fuel efficiency tracking and erratic electronics
Despite marketing the car as highway and terrain-ready, the Kiger struggled during long interstate drives, especially in hilly regions and uneven surfaces.
Example: During a multi-state journey from Uttarakhand to Mysore, the car’s performance dropped significantly on steep climbs, with noticeable lag, poor braking control, and inconsistent pickup. Cabin components began rattling, and AC effectiveness dropped drastically in mountain heat.
Over a span of four months, I had to visit the service center more than 14 times—unacceptable for a new car marketed as reliable.
Service advisors frequently denied underlying issues or downplayed them
Diagnostics were either incomplete or masked by temporary fixes
Parts availability delays, even for standard repairs
Poor escalation resolution, and no follow-up support from brand channels
Even more concerning, dealers and service personnel often lacked technical depth, indicating weak internal training and poor knowledge transfer from Renault HQ.
The disconnect between the promise of a “premium, next-gen SUV” and the actual ownership friction creates several consequences:
This mismatch does more than disappoint—it erodes credibility, leads to negative word-of-mouth, and ensures no return customers or referrals. In a market where over 70% of car buyers rely on peer recommendations, this creates a silent but deadly long-term brand erosion.
Despite the challenges faced, Renault made no effort to recover the relationship, such as:
No proactive feedback calls after multiple service visits
No goodwill gestures, courtesy inspections, or product upgrades
No ownership community check-ins or retention programs
Contrast this with how Hyundai or Tata may offer extended warranty vouchers, priority service lanes, or dedicated relationship managers in similar cases.
This shows that Renault doesn’t view the user journey holistically. For them, the sale is the end. For the customer, it’s just the beginning.
The Kiger case is not isolated—it’s symptomatic of Renault’s India-wide approach:
Promising Western design cues, delivering basic Indian fit and finish
Advertising emotional journeys, delivering transactional experiences
Projecting urban versatility, building fragile commuter vehicles
When marketing races ahead of product readiness and service maturity, the gap becomes a trap. Renault’s customers feel cheated—not just by a car, but by a brand they wanted to believe in.
The Renault Kiger case exemplifies why marketing alone cannot build loyalty. If the product and after-sales support don’t deliver on the promise, the brand loses not just a customer—but their community, influence, and advocacy.
The dissonance between Renault’s narrative and real-life experience is not just damaging—it is fatal in a social-media–amplified, peer-reviewed economy.
If Renault wishes to survive in India, it must do more than sell cars. It must relearn empathy, humility, and consistency—the pillars of lasting relevance in Indian mobility culture.
Renault entered India with the right ambition, but a flawed execution strategy. Its early success with the Duster and Kwid offered the illusion of sustainable growth, but the brand has since failed to evolve in line with market expectations, regulatory shifts, and cultural realities. Through the analysis of its product strategy, after-sales ecosystem, branding misfires, and organizational disconnection, it becomes evident that Renault’s current approach is unsustainable in the hyper-competitive Indian automotive landscape.
The Kiger case study illustrates the brand’s deeper structural problems: a compelling marketing promise that collapses under the weight of poor execution. Even more damaging is Renault’s inability—or unwillingness—to listen, learn, and localize.
India today is not just a price-sensitive market; it is a value-sensitive, emotionally driven, and culturally nuanced environment. OEMs that recognize this—such as Tata, Hyundai-Kia, and Maruti Suzuki—are thriving not just on technology or features, but on trust, empathy, responsiveness, and storytelling.
Renault’s continued decline is not inevitable—but without radical strategic course correction, it may become irreversible.
Invest in Local R&D for India-first products
Launch an EV strategy with 2–3 models in key segments
Fix service operations and digitize customer engagement
Improve safety standards and highlight them in marketing
Expand dealer and service network beyond metros
Build a strong brand identity (e.g., “Smart Cars for Smart India”)
Partner with fintech and mobility platforms for bundled offers and shared ownership models
To avoid irrelevance and reposition itself for long-term success in India, Renault must act boldly and immediately across five key domains:
Invest in India-specific R&D: No more global retrofits. Develop platforms tailored to Indian terrain, usage behavior, and regulatory needs.
Safety as a non-negotiable: Build 4- or 5-star GNCAP-rated vehicles as a baseline, not a premium.
Powertrain modernization: Introduce hybrid, CNG, and EV variants to meet upcoming energy expectations.
Rethink the SUV approach: Focus on real-world durability, ride quality, and genuine SUV functionality—not cosmetic bulk.
Create a digitally empowered, empathy-led service ecosystem:
Introduce 24×7 helpline, predictive maintenance alerts, transparent billing.
Offer priority lanes and loyalty service programs for repeat customers.
Standardize service quality across all dealerships with measurable KPIs.
Launch a customer resolution taskforce for handling high-frequency complaints.
Establish a brand narrative rooted in Indian values—family, resilience, trust, long journeys.
Move from “affordable” to “emotionally desirable” by using:
Regional festivals
Indian faces in campaigns
Real-owner storytelling
Launch community engagement programs: drive clubs, local meetups, safety camps, and ownership anniversaries.
Bring the Dacia Spring (Kwid EV equivalent) to India with localization.
Join central/state EV pilot programs with low-cost city EVs.
Set up EV-focused showrooms and micro-mobility partnerships in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities.
Invest in R&D collaboration with Indian startups for local battery management systems and AI-powered diagnostics.
Decentralize Indian decision-making to empower local leadership.
Appoint an India CEO with long-term vision and autonomy, not just an execution manager.
Engage actively with SIAM, ARAI, and EV councils to align future roadmap with policy directions.
Train all internal teams (including dealers) on India-first product, cultural, and customer handling skills.
As someone who has studied not just Renault’s decline but also Nissan’s earlier failure in the Indian context—and experienced Renault’s promise and pitfalls firsthand through 30,000 km of driving—I believe the brand still holds potential. However, potential without commitment, and ambition without cultural fit, is a recipe for market rejection.
Renault must stop playing defense in India. It must reimagine itself as an Indian company that happens to have French roots—not the other way around. Only then can it hope to reclaim relevance, respect, and resonance in the minds of India’s increasingly demanding car buyers.
Bisht, Akshat Singh. Primary Field Notes and Observations on Renault Kiger Ownership Experience — Including 14+ Service Visits, 30,000+ km Cross-Country Use, and Dealership-Level Interactions across India. 2025. Personal Research.
Bisht, Akshat Singh. Why Nissan Failed in India: Internal Whitepaper and Market Study. 2025. Published Manuscript.
Business Standard. “Renault India Faces Dealer Backlash over Service Delays.” Business Standard, 2024, www.business-standard.com.
Deloitte India. The Future of Auto Retail in India. 2023, www2.deloitte.com/in.
Economic Times Auto. “EV Policy Shifts in India: OEMs Race Ahead, Renault Lags Behind.” Economic Times Auto, 2024, auto.economictimes.indiatimes.com.
FAME India Scheme. FAME II: Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles. Department of Heavy Industries, Government of India, 2024, fame2.heavyindustries.gov.in.
Global NCAP. Crash Test Results – India. 2023, www.globalncap.org.
Hyundai India Media Centre. “Connected Car Strategy and Regional Campaign Success.” Hyundai India, 2024, www.hyundai.com/in/en.
India Brand Equity Foundation. Automobile Industry in India. 2024, www.ibef.org/industry/automobiles.
KPMG India. Customer Experience in Automotive: Closing the Expectation Gap. 2023, home.kpmg/in.
NITI Aayog. EV Vision Document for India. 2023, www.niti.gov.in.
Press Trust of India. “Renault Takes Over Full Control of Oragadam Plant from Nissan.” The Hindu BusinessLine, 14 July 2023, www.thehindubusinessline.com.
Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM). Monthly Auto Market Data. 2024, www.siam.in.
Tata Motors. Annual Report 2022–2023: EV Strategy, Localization and R&D Focus. 2023, www.tatamotors.com.
Autocar India. “Why Renault’s Line-Up in India Is Losing Relevance.” Autocar India, 2023, www.autocarindia.com.
Akshat’s passion for marketing and dedication to helping others has been the driving force behind AkshatSinghBisht.com. Known for his insightful perspectives, practical advice, and unwavering commitment to his audience, Akshat is a trusted voice in the marketing community.
If you have any questions simply use the following contact details.
